this instance but his para (a) is
ridiculars
that
a
?
Explain that the mere fact-
i am in awaited. not morally performed in the
work must not be regarded as
Clai
to conceptional
treatment, since the fort has the right to his full time
o that.
recomendations for gratuities
must not to made
matter
久
gur ogen z
but must be made only in
most exceptional are? f
officer's
U
When the work has her of an unusually meriprians character.
No. 100.
Hongkong.
#9-10
My Lord,
.0.
RECR
Res 28 Pk 10
589
Government House,
Hongkong, 23rd. March, 1910.
In reply to Your Lordship's Des-
mu
A&C
675-
129726
172609
-patch No. 33 of the 28th. of last January, I have the
honour to repeat the recomendation made in my Despatch
No. 376 of the 3rd. of last December, which I base upon the
following grounds, viz.:-
{} -
That the services of the two
Officers in question were in fact so exceptional as to
entitle them to special treatment, for Mr. G. A. Woodcock
was doing the work of a post and a half, while Mr. C. A. D...
Melbourne also was hard put to it to complete the work
which fell to his share.
(b).
That an exactly similar arrange-
-ment was approved by Your Lordship in Despatch No. 197
of the 10th. September, 1909, and that it would be unfair
now to make a different ruling in exactly similar
circumstances, especially as the pay has already been drawn
in
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
THE EARL OF CREWE,
800-
80...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.